The Yamaha FZ-Rave is the newest member of Yamaha’s popular FZ family and enters the highly competitive 150–160cc commuter-sport motorcycle segment. While it shares much of its mechanical foundation with the FZ and FZ-S, the FZ-Rave brings refreshed styling aimed at younger, city-focused riders.

However, it faces stiff competition from established segment leaders such as the Hero Xtreme 160R, TVS Apache RTR 160 2V, Honda SP160 and Bajaj Pulsar N160. Here’s a detailed comparison based on engine, performance, dimensions, suspension, braking, features and price to help you understand how the new Yamaha stacks up.

Engine & Performance: Apache RTR 160 2V Leads the Pack

All five motorcycles use air-cooled, SOHC, single-cylinder engines, but output figures vary significantly.

The Yamaha FZ-Rave has the smallest displacement (149cc) and, unsurprisingly, makes the least power and torque on paper. In contrast, the TVS Apache RTR 160 2V remains the most powerful at 16.04hp, with the Bajaj Pulsar N160 close behind at 16hp.

Interestingly, the Honda SP160 produces the highest torque figure, while both the FZ-Rave and SP160 deliver peak torque early in the rev range—ideal for city riding and quicker low-speed response.

Engine & Output Comparison

Weight & Dimensions: FZ-Rave Is the Lightest Motorcycle Here

The Yamaha FZ-Rave regains ground with its 136kg kerb weight—the lowest of all five bikes—which should help offset its lower power in real-world use. The Pulsar N160, meanwhile, is the heaviest at 152kg, likely due to its larger tank and stronger hardware.

However, the FZ-Rave also has the lowest ground clearance (165mm), tied with the Pulsar, which may affect performance over speed breakers.

Dimensions Comparison

Suspension, Brakes & Tyres: Pulsar N160 Gets Premium Hardware

All motorcycles get a telescopic front fork and monoshock rear setup on their base variants. But the Bajaj Pulsar N160 stands out by offering a USD fork on the higher variant—an advantage at this price point.

The FZ-Rave and Pulsar N160 come only with rear disc brakes, while others offer both drum and disc. Single-channel ABS is standard on all bikes, but the N160 and Apache RTR 160 2V also offer dual-channel ABS options.

The FZ-Rave runs the widest rear tyre (140-section), giving it better grip, stability and a more muscular stance.

Suspension & Brakes Comparison

Features: Honda SP160 and Apache RTR 160 2V Take the Lead

Feature levels vary significantly across the segment.

• The Yamaha FZ-Rave keeps things simple with a negative LCD display and single-channel ABS.

• The Hero Xtreme 160R offers a comparable feature set in its base trim.

• The TVS Apache RTR 160 2V provides the most variant choices, and top trims bring:

  • Dual-channel ABS

  • Bluetooth-compatible console

  • SmartXonnect with ride analytics

  • Three ride modes

  • Glide Through Technology (GTT) for easier city riding

• The Honda SP160 uniquely features a 4.2-inch TFT display with Bluetooth and navigation via the RoadSync app.

• The Pulsar N160 offers Bluetooth connectivity and three ABS modes—Road, Rain and Off-road.

Price Comparison: Hero Xtreme 160R Remains the Value King

In terms of pricing, the Hero Xtreme 160R is the most affordable. The Yamaha FZ-Rave sits in the middle of the price spectrum, offering reasonable value but facing stronger-performing rivals at similar prices.

Price (Ex-showroom, Delhi)

Conclusion: Should You Buy the Yamaha FZ Rave?

The Yamaha FZ-Rave may not match its rivals in outright performance or advanced features, but it remains a reliable, lightweight, comfortable, and city-friendly motorcycle. Riders prioritising ease of use, refinement and Yamaha’s proven durability may still find it appealing.

However, buyers seeking:

• Better performance → Apache RTR 160 2V / Pulsar N160

• More features → Honda SP160 / Apache RTR 160 2V

• Best value → Hero Xtreme 160R

…may choose differently based on their priorities.